On 06/14/2011 12:50 PM, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 21:44 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> I wouldn't bother much if it would be just one tiny bit of strange code
>> in systemd, but it is FAR from being the only such code. There are lots
>> of similar stuff, and it's not accidental.
> It is definitely not accidental, but unless you have bugs to file, I
> don't think complain generically about systemd architecture here is any
> productive.
Where, in your opinion, is the place to discuss systemd architecture?
systemd upstream list as I has been pointed out a few times
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
I disagree, and I find the attitude "we are developers, you are
idiot"
both quite common and quite wrong.
I am a developer too, do you want me to treat *you* this way too when
you will have trouble with my software?
I don't think you are helping yourself with the antagonistic approach
you have taken. If I had trouble with your software, I would start by
asking questions on why things the way they are rather than immediately
start telling you, the way you have written it is entirely wrong.
Rahul