On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 10:39:24AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
That's your opinion. My opinion is that opensource implies only
that
you have access to the source and rights to with it (mostly) as you
like, which doesn't necessarily imply any sort of binary redistribution
right.
But your definition is not really close to what is usually meant
with Open Source (it's maybe more close to what M$ sometimes
suggests it thinks it is ;-)).
Of course, neither of our (or anyone's not officially
representing
Fedora) opinions mean squat.
True.
--
-- Jos Vos <jos(a)xos.nl>
-- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364
-- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204