Because the naming of the tool is upstream decision I opened a discussion
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/discussions/210. DNF and the new tool is
shipped into multiple upstream therefore we have to collect feedback from multiple
distribution and upstream discussion channel is the bet place for that. I asked there
several question and I provided 3 basic scenarios.
```
What name (**dnf**, yum, **dnf5**, or microdnf ) we should use for package providing
binary (currently DNF5)?
What binary name or symlink we should use in man pages (currently DNF5) for examples?
What binary name or symlink we should use in Fedora guidelines?
What binary name or symlink we should use in RHEL guidelines?
How we should name packages containing plugins (additional command)?
```
Best regards
Jaroslav