On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 09:51:31AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 15:48 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 01:32:29PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > In general there's usecases where a low resource desktop is useful,
> > > such on devices with only 1Gb of RAM where Workstation doesn't
provide
> > > a good experience.
> >
> > I definitely agree that there's value in providing for such usecases, but
I
> > also think there's value in defining that as outside of Workstation's
scope
> > and using another name for that offering -- whether just Fedora XFCE or
> > other.
>
> That's what's proposed here, AFAICS. There doesn't seem to be any
> indication that this would be Workstation-branded. It's just bringing
> up an existing spin on another arch, essentially.
That is correct, there's no intention of branding this as Workstation.
This is purely bringing the XFCE spin as a pre-built image
OK. The Change text is clearly confusing in this regards, because it doesn't
mention "XFCE spin" anywhere.
Zbyszek