On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 06:14, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> advocating less functionality but the comments of the people who
suggested
> these ideas made sense to me.
I agree with the basic idea. But I don't see how killing a feature
that's been there from 5.2 at least is going to improve other tools. It
should be in low maintenance mode by now IMHO.
Then maybe you can take over that section of the code? Sorry for the
impertinous, but any time I see someone saying IMHO about code it says
to me that they are volunteering to take over that code.
--
Stephen John Smoogen smoogen(a)lanl.gov
Los Alamos National Lab CCN-5 Sched 5/40 PH: 4-0645
Ta-03 SM-1498 MailStop B255 DP 10S Los Alamos, NM 87545
-- So shines a good deed in a weary world. = Willy Wonka --