On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 18:54 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 10.02.2012 18:49, schrieb Jef Spaleta:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl(a)thelounge.net>
wrote:
>> no i can not because it is a one-shot thing to do "yum distro-sync"
and so i
>> had no time for a bugrport while other more important things like mysqld were
>> horrible broken
>
> Let me strongly suggest, that unfiled problems will never get fixed
> because you cannot assume your workflow is part of anyone elses
> prerelease testing.
> Let me further stridently suggest that if you or any user insist on
> using an upgrade path which is stated as a matter of policy as
> unsupported
so this policy has to be adopted to the real life damned
you can i imagine you upgrade a virtual production server with
Preupgrade/Anaconda? this is only a bad joke while if Fedora
put more care in yum-upgrade and supports it this does well
while services are up
You're not supposed to be running Fedora on production servers. That is
not what it's for.
I do this too, but when something in Fedora makes it a bit inconvenient,
I don't whine and throw all my toys from the perambulator, because I
know I'm using Fedora for something it's not entirely intended for, and
so I accept the pain and deal with it. It's like using a Lamborghini as
your daily runabout: you can do it, but you probably shouldn't whine
about how LAMBORGHINIS SUCK if you chip the undercarriage on a speed
bump.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net