On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 18:41 +0200, Dennis J. wrote:
If that's the case then it obviously makes sense to stick with
grub
"legacy" but given it's status who is going to be upstream for this? What I
fear is a similar situation like we had with rpm where nobody really took
ownership and vendors carried their own individual patches wich doesn't
really work well with fedoras "stay close to upstream" mantra.
For better or worse, we are effectively running a grub fork, and I see
very little desire to change that...