On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 17:40 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 17:15 -0700, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> A compromise works best if both parties are on board. I don't believe
> that the desktop guys will object to the package existing and being
> installable if people want. No CLI needed since we have GUI install
> tools. The objection is with the mandate for it to be installed by
> default on the desktop live/install spins.
See, the Desktop team has no say in whether or not a graphical mixer is
available in Fedora. The middle ground between reverting the mixer
feature all together and leaving at is it is having a graphical mixer
installed by default available in the menus. That was the compromise.
If the Desktop team really feels like this wasn't a compromise and it
was something mandated and forced, they can raise it to the board level
if they wish.
The mandate is for both Desktop/LiveCD spin and Fedora default install,
surely the Desktop team does decide for the desktop/livecd spin, but not
or the Fedora install. Since I'm sure the KDE spin won't want to include
either of these.
Dave.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list