On Thursday, 14 March 2019 at 10:06, Miro HronĨok wrote:
On 14. 03. 19 7:51, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
[...]
> Maybe what we need is to have koji for example refusing epoch
bumps
> (and thus failing the build) if _not bumping_ epoch would _not break_
> the upgrade path to ensure that epoch is only ever increased when we
> need to force a downgrade or when upstream changes versioning schemes
> in a way not considered an upgrade by RPM's NVR.
Or use Pull Requests in the workflow and have somebody else review the
commit before it gets to Fedora?
While that's a good idea in general, how do you propose to implement
this for packages that have only a single maintainer?
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora
https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion
http://rpmfusion.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan