On Sun, 2009-05-03 at 10:12 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
The problem is that it seems Bastien didn't think too hard about what
use cases the design would need to cover, in terms of actual uses of
actual hardware. Note that this is not the same as attacking the
interface design per se. The design is fine for the use cases it
covers.
The problem is it doesn't cover all of the use cases it needs to.
The use cases were there for people to read for *1 frickin' year*. It
went through Fesco's approval. You would have thought *someone* *anyone*
would have seen that use cases were missing.
You didn't, I didn't, people tried to close the door after the horse had
bolted.