On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Doug Ledford wrote:
> Fixes my problem
> Works for me (someone testing that didn't necessarily have any of the
> problem supposedly fixed by this update just noting that their system
> still works ok with the update)
> Doesn't fix my problem (but doesn't necessarily imply it's any worse
> than before)
> Causes new problems
Yes, this makes more sense than just +1 and -1.
> (which should, IMO, be an automatic veto of any push to stable, requiring
> intervention to override)
But no, please no! While it should definitely prevent an automatic push if
the maintainer enabled that, it should not keep the maintainer from pushing
anyway.
Well the way I read it, "manually pushing anyway" is the "requiring
intervention" part.
- Panu -