Hi Jens,
Apologies for resurrecting and older thread here
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 02:06:22PM +0800, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
(Not sure if it makes sense to post to Discourse: Haskell library
reviews
are still a little bit "esoteric" since ghc uses some non-standard linking
(ie various warnings appear which tend to discourage/throw less experienced
reviewers alas: perhaps they should be spelled out further as exception(s)
in the Haskell Packaging policy, so I don't need to keep explaining them).
Warnings from fedora-review and rpmlint, or in the build output?
If the warnings are from the first two, we should probably try and get
them fixed - I will try and look closely the next time I do a Haskell
review.
Some other ecosystems (e.g. Guile) also trigger a lot of rpmlint
warnings, and I have in mind fixing the rpmlint policies so that at some
point we can actually make use of the result - right now there's too
many false positives.
Best regards,
--
_o) Michel Lind (né Salim)
_( ) identities:
https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2