On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 23:51 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 15:55 -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On 12/8/05, Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha <strange(a)nsk.no-ip.org> wrote:
> > Yes. Because I'm doing cache operations, not repository operations. Or
> > rather, that's what I thought I was doing, so it would be intuitive to
> > me.
>
> So for completeness what your saying is that you think
> yum clean packages should clean all packages from all enabled and
> disabled repos by default?
>
> and yum clean headers should clean all headers from all enabled and
> disabled repos by default?
Well, I actually think it should.
Seriously? That seems completely backward to me.
it's like saying rsync --exclude=/some/path should not actually exclude
that path.
or that a disabled samba share shouldn't ACTUALLY be disabled.
why on earth do you think yum should do what it's been told NOT to do?
-sv