On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 13:17:43 -0800, Adam wrote:
On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 20:18 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Three times "Could". Let's talk about it when you know something
definite,
> please, but before it will become another hurdle.
That's ironic - given that that's exactly what the people defending this
proposal wanted to do, while it's someone who's opposed to the proposal
who decided to start a premature argument about it.
Then let's see this thread as the updates-testing push of a proposal
FESCo might have given its blessing to, if this thread had not been
started.