On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 04:15:24PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote on 08/05/2017 05:00 AM:
>On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 13:19 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes soname
>>bump. I will take care of rebuilding the affected packages:
>>
>>boomaga
>>calligra
>>cups-filters
>>evas-generic-loaders
>>gambas3
>>gdal
>>gdcm
>>inkscape
>>kf5-kfilemetadata
>>libreoffice
>>okular
>>pdf2djvu
>>poppler-sharp
>>texlive
>>texworks
>
>Welp, the rebuild of texlive failed, which means gdal can't be built,
>and I can't build openqa. And none of this seems to have been touched
>since yesterday,
Umm? Did you really check?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?order=-completion_time&use...
>so now it's probably going to be stuck over the
>weekend, right?
>
>Perhaps next time, you could test rebuilds of at least major things
>like texlive against the new poppler *before* you land the new poppler
>into rawhide? Thanks.
And then, if test rebuild of such a big package like texlive against
new poppler fails, poppler maintainer has to wait until texlive is
to be ported into new poppler?
Yes! That's how the new "no alphas" rawhide is supposed to
look. Maintainers are supposed to avoid a state where rawhide is
broken.
poppler shouldn't be *blocked*, but it should be delayed a bit, so
that maintainers of the dependent packages are given a few days to
find a resolution.
Zbyszek