On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 11:17:47PM +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 06:42:41PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> If you peek at the affected files, you'll see that they actually are not
> "included" as far as rpm is concerned. rpm looks at the "package
foo"
> statements when building the list of Provides, and "use/require foo" for
> Requires.
Ah yes, ok, then I shouldn't blame rpm's scripts.
Actually, the final fix needs to be in rpm helper scripts, there's
a couple of regex's that need tweaking or special casing.
Because of the nature of drilling an entire dependency tree, a global
approach is needed, case by case is better hacked around with %__find_requires.
73 de Jeff
--
Jeff Johnson ARS N3NPQ
jbj(a)redhat.com (jbj(a)jbj.org)
Chapel Hill, NC