On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 07:25:51AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 12:20:09 +0000
"J??hann B. Gu??mundsson" <johannbg(a)hi.is> wrote:
> Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:57:08 +0000
> > ""J??hann B. Gu??mundsson"" <johannbg(a)hi.is> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> With strictly the media support ( ugly-plugins etc. ) and the
> >> rpmfusion repo installed,
> >> and excluding AMD and Nvidia drivers
> >> will we need Rename the spin or could it be released under Fedora name
> >> and artwork? * Legal/others
> >>
> >
> > No. You are including content that is not in Fedora, therefor you
> > cannot use the Fedora trademark and cannot use the trademarked logos.
> > You would have some renaming work ahead of you.
> >
> >
> I guessed so.. and replacing the artwork as well right?
Yes.
With the exception of the trademarked logos, the rest of the artwork
is licensed to be reused, so it need not all be replaced.
> But would I still be allowed to update and use Fedora repos right?
You could have the spin pull from the Fedora repos for things, yes.
> As in how deep would I need to go in renaming things?
> Removing every image containing the Fedora logo and every instance of
> the word Fedora.
> Repackage?
I'm not sure but it wouldn't be trivial.
There's work underway to make the fedora-logos package replaceable
exactly so this task becomes trivial.
--
Matt Domsch
Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
linux.dell.com &
www.dell.com/linux