On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 07:35:37 -0500
Josh Boyer <jwboyer(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Toshio Kuratomi
<a.badger(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> <nod> That does a great job of explaining what we had here. The
> difference this time is that instead of architecture being the key,
> version of xz was the key. The new and old versions of xz create
> compatible archives but they aren't byte-for-byte identical. That
> could lead to certain circumstances where the rpm signature was
> invalid for an rpm reconstructed from a deltarpm even though the
> uncompressed data was the same.
I updated the wiki page a bit.
Thank you Josh. It's appreciated.
kevin