On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 07:31:53PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> That might be a good idea, or a blocker bug. How do we make
sure that
>> not too many or too obscure bugs get set to this keyword / blockerbug?
>> Just remove abusing bugs?
> Yeah, although we'd have to carefully pick the keyword so as to not offend
> someone if *their* pet peeve bug got removed.
I must say I'm more in favor of a blocker bug (since I'm unfamiliar with
the use of keywords)
I'm not sure a blocker bug is really appropriate, as by definition it's
unlikely all the dependencies will ever be resolved.
Keywords are really trivial.
--
Matthew Miller mattdm(a)mattdm.org <
http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <
http://linux.bu.edu/>