On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 15:22 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Right, it absolutely would require you to setarch before launching a
build for the 32-bit arch. The question is why that's so unworkable.
Especially when the present alternative just plain doesn't work.
I note that it's already expected by a lot of spec files (or at least
by several of mine) that `uname -i` correctly reports the target arch.
I honestly don't know. I don't see much wrong with it.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca:
http://identi.ca/jkeating