On Mo, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:28:57 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
Is there any reason not to use the date as the version? It's in
YYYYMMDD
format so there shouldn't be a upgrade path issue but this isn't explicitly
covered in the packaging guidelines that I can find.
If you make it as a post release from the latest regular release, you
can easily adjust if they go back to normal releases without requiring
an epoch.
Regards
Till