On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 00:57, seth vidal wrote:
On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 23:54 -0700, Paul Rigor wrote:
> Red Hat's name is still on the line if its side projects mess up... hence
> the control?
>
red hat's name is on the line if they fail to interact with people in
the community in positive ways.
And which one do you think is more detrimental headline?
1. open software vendor includes bugs in free software product
or
2. open source software vendor fails to communicate or interact
favorably with open source developers outside of own company.
Hmmm Red Hat is f*k'd either way. Maybe it should just get out of the
business of Open Source.. it seems like too much work to be useful.
-sv
--
Stephen John Smoogen smoogen(a)lanl.gov
Los Alamos National Lab CCN-5 Sched 5/40 PH: 4-0645
Ta-03 SM-1498 MailStop B255 DP 10S Los Alamos, NM 87545
-- You should consider any operational computer to be a security problem --