On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Till Maas <opensource(a)till.name> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 01:10:34PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> * ticket 864 F18 Feature: DNF -
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF (nirik, 17:44:17)
> * AGREED: Feature is approved (+8/0) (nirik, 17:56:59)
It would help a lot if a features are only approved, when they have
descriptive names. From the message above it is completely unclear what
was approved. But if the feature was named like for example "DNF package
manager preview" there would be at least some information about what the
DNF features is supposed to be.
Because you can't click on the link and read about the feature where
it describes this in detail?
This is just an example, the other features could mostly be better
named
as well imho, for example the "Clojure" Feature as "Full Clojure
Stack".
Unless you know what Clojure, you're still either clicking on the link
or googling for it's meaning.
There's nothing really wrong with your suggestion, but I very much
doubt it's going to help in a practical way.
josh