On Wednesday, August 21, 2019 2:00:07 AM MST Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:52:18PM -0700, John Harris wrote:
> Having a container without a package manager sounds like the worst
> possible thing to add to an already poorly implemented solution. In
> reality, containers, regardless of what they're running, should be
> treated as what they are, GNU/Linux installs. Each one should be self
> sufficient from the host system, so that they can be properly updated
> using a package manager.
> Each container should, realistically, be a self contained system.
You do not update the container. You rebuild it, creating new image
with updated components, then you test&roll out new image.
Package manager is only needed during the build (in fact, it
is indispensable at this step) but not during runtime.
--
Tomasz .. oo o. oo o. .o .o o. o. oo o. ..
Torcz .. .o .o .o .o oo oo .o .. .. oo oo
o.o.o. .o .. o. o. o. o. o. o. oo .. .. o.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List
Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List
Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Why in the world would anyone do such a thing? That is impossible to maintain,
and is a horrible security risk.
--
John M. Harris, Jr. <johnmh(a)splentity.com>
Splentity
https://splentity.com/