-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 23:52 +0000, Paul F. Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> In order to pull in packagers like those maintaining Dries, Dag
>> Weirs, freshrpms, and others, and in order to assure Fedora
>> users that their packages would work instead of saying, "if you
>> don't use official packages, you're on your own," has there
>> been any conversation on taking an example from Debian and
>> having a non-free repository? It would also free up the
>> packagers who spend so much time duplicating each other's
>> packages in order to ensure compatibility. I know there are
>> issues with their ffmpeg and mp3 codecs, but could these issues
>> be solved simply by designating their repositories as
>> non-free? I think it would greatly enhance the Fedora
>> experience, IMHO as a loyal FC user since Yarrow.
>
> Personally, I'd love to see everything under one roof or failing
> that, have freshrpms and livna have the equivalent of a rawhide
> build.
http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/freshrpms/fedora/linux/development/
These are not the packages you are looking for...
josh
using the force there? q;o)
- --
Eric Mesa
ericsbinaryworld(a)gmail.com
http://www.ericsbinaryworld.com
Note: All emails from this address should have a GPG signature. If
you have the proper setup you can use this to confirm my identity and
that the email was not changed in transit.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFD+841PvU+8ApmWXIRAuEDAJkBy2E7qmQtBQw96rb6ymDfZ+j1WgCdGGM8
8jaIJ+dBBATqNPuA/IKIRAY=
=nB/2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----