On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:37:16AM -0800, Tom Stellard wrote:
On 12/16/21 09:07, Jeremy Newton wrote:
> Full disclosure, I am both a Fedora packager and an employee at AMD.
> To be clear, the following is not at all endorsed by my employer; my interest and
use of Fedora is purely a personal hobby and I would like to keep it that way.
>
> There has been a recent effort to step up Debian packaging of ROCm, and would like
to see if anyone has some interest in expanding the Fedora ROCm packages.
>
> I see there's a few packages already, and I'm hoping to help with some
internal processes to make ROCm more distro friendly, such as better FHS compliance,
clearer licensing, etc.
> Anyone interested? I would be happy to try to help or review package requests :)
Would you be interested in maintaining the existing packages? I could use
some help keeping them up-to-date with the latest versions.
I'm also interested in helping package more of ROCm, but ideally
everyone interested in this should co-maintain.
Best regards,
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile:
https://keyoxide.org/michel@michel-slm.name