On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 22:47, Jeremy Katz wrote:
But this isn't really all that ideal from an interface point of
view.
I agree. It is kind of a one-time special case though.
Why should this be handled separately from the rest of the questions
about my partitions? I'm also trying to move to less dialogs, not
more. Some thought is definitely required. Another option would be a
special-case of preexisting /home getting mounted with the context mount
options, but I don't really like that other (it feels like a hack).
That's an option, but it is a little tricky. We'd have to be sure to
give every domain that the user runs access to that type; e.g. right now
ssh will refuse to look at a key unless it's user_home_ssh_t.
No, that's completely and utterly manual. How do I scp to them?
for machine in foo bar baz blah; do
scp policy.15 $machine:
done
?
I've
written the expect script to do this sort of thing before and it's not
really what you want to use in an environment of any size. If I have to
at all touch a machine to make a trivial and common change like this,
then I'm not really centrally administered.
You could also have a polling model or something where the machines
check for updates from the central server. I don't see what's wrong
with push though...