On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 22:21:39 +0100
Tom Hughes <tom(a)compton.nu> wrote:
On 17/10/2019 21:39, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Thursday, October 17, 2019 4:21:44 PM EDT Tom Hughes wrote:
>> On 17/10/2019 20:44, Steve Grubb wrote:
>>> I don't think __x86_64__ is defined as the program is aimed at
>>> eBPF in the
>>> kernel. In rawhide, we no longer have glibc-devel(x86-32) to
>>> allow this to
>>> resolve. However, I think that the assumption of not having
>>> __x86_64__ defined means we are targeting i686 is wrong. What
>>> should I do? Do we not support eBPF programs on Fedora?
>>
>> I can still see glibc-devel.i686 in rawhide which provides that.
>
> In rawhide I got [1]:
>
> No matching package to install: 'glibc-devel(x86-32)'
>
> But on my local system, F30, it works fine.
I just tried it with mock on F30:
mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --install 'glibc-devel(x86-32)'
and that worked fine.
>> As far as I know the 32 bit multilib packages aren't going away.
>
> Hmm. I still wonder if the headers might need reworking to not
> assume 32 bit if the target is bpf.
I don't know enough about how the BPF backend works to be
able to comment on that.
I guess the problem will be building in koji, it isn't multi-lib
capable.
Dan