Dne 28. 06. 23 v 23:39 Kalev Lember napsal(a):
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 8:03 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
<devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
FTBFS:
0ad
arbor
CuraEngine
bout++
cachelib
dolphin-emu
folly
freeopcua
gerbera
luxcorerender
mangohud
wasmedge
watchman
I fixed 0ad from that list and built it in the side tag.
I think I will merge this side tag without fmt9 compatibility package
tomorrow.
Why? Now that you've already done all the work of adding the
compatibility package, why drop it and break all of the unbuilt
packages in rawhide? I don't think any of the packages from the list
are release blocking, but it just seems antisocial for rawhide users
to break packages they might be using, especially if it's no extra
work for you at this point.
This don't necessarily breaks Rawhide users. It just won't let them
update some packages. The only question is if the packages gets fixed
eventually.
Vít
Another thing that comes in my mind is that there is the ongoing
python rebuild in f39-python and your rebuilt package set probably
intersects with it. Would be good to let Miro know what packages they
need to rebuild again once your fmt tag is merged.
--
Kalev
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list --devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email todevel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List
Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List
Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedora...
Do not reply to spam, report it:https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue