Am 05.02.2013 22:21, schrieb Luya Tshimbalanga:
On 05/02/13 12:09 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
> In the Gnome2 days you had choices between functionally similar DEs.
>
> Times have changed ... Gnome has been forked multiply (Gnome3, MATE, Cinammon),
xfce/enlightenment are back.
>
Gnome 3 is still Gnome. Both MATE and Cinnamon which came years after Gnome 3 via
Gnome-Shell, are reactionary for
self-interest because these DE can easily reproduced through Gnome-Shell extensions
meaning they will become
irrelevant in a future
and if the developers (in this case GNOME developers) would
be less ignorant while punish their users they would never
became relevent because there would have been no reason to fork
because these DE can easily reproduced through Gnome-Shell extensions
and why the hell did upstream not do this work from the
very frist beginning?
my definition of REwrite and optimize is
* clean up the code base
* provide the same functionality as before
* fix bugs
* release