On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 14:08, seth vidal wrote:
> Right. To actually get up to speed on this (RHL73 and RHL9
backports), I
> think some kind of infrastructure etc. should be set up already (and try
> practising e.g. with RHL62 backports, even.)
I've been practicing 7.3 backports already - I have no interest in 6.2
backports and I've no 6.2 machines to practice on even if I had an
interest.
but I agree some infrastructure should happen.
maybe what was already at fedora.us could be used.
I would think that the fedora.us bugzilla could be used in the same
manner for the QA, although a new Product should probably be added for
"fedora legacy" so it is easy to separate it from the other items in QA.
As for the build server, I think Warren has probably scaled as far as he
can for the time being, but it would be cool if someone else could
provide a build server (possibly using mach?) and take over those duties
on the legacy project.
Phil