Le Mar 2 février 2010 22:11, Kevin Kofler a écrit :
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> This changelog style conforms to the existing spec, it has been in use in
> Fedora for several years, it may surprise you, but changing the spec
> retroactively is not the way to prove your point.
Uh, the Fedora packaging guidelines DO have the power to change the
requirements, they're not cast in stone. Even existing changelogs can be
fixed.
Again, last time changelog was discussed some practises like putting the
version in the changelog header were accepted even though they conflict with
rpm internals (as was re-affirmed again by rpm people).
This is a much bigger problem than your cosmetic issues with my way of using
changelog style #3 (which, incidentally, means my changelogs are not randomly
reordered so in practice it works better than other styles)
--
Nicolas Mailhot