2006/2/22, Tom Brinkman <tbrinkman(a)sbcglobal.net>:
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 08:57, Joachim Frieben wrote:
> Yes, for the "nv" driver, you do not obtain any hardware
> acceleration at all.
Not quite true, an hasn't been for several years. What you don't
have with 'nv' is direct rendering (DRI). Needed for 3d/accel games.
Prior to SGI's contributions a few years ago, 'glxgears' wouldn't
even run at all.
(from glxinfo)
display: :0 screen: 0
direct rendering: No
server glx vendor string: SGI
server glx version string: 1.2
> So, the values are still reasonable for pure
> soft rendering and equivalent for my own older hardware with "DRI"
> enabled!
>
> > I get 160/170 on nvidia [Quadro4 NVS AGP 8x]. Standard "nv"
> > driver, no nvidia driver.
GeF4, nv driver, Athlon XP 3200+/400.. 380 / 390fps on the small
default window, but when run full screen, 1280x1024-24 it drops to
27 / 30fps.
--
Tom Brinkman Corpus Christi, Texas
--
umm care to elaborate what is hardware accelerated by the gpu with
software rendering and the nv driver if the cpu does all the
rendering?
regards,
Rudolf Kastl
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list