On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 05:57:57PM +0200, Adam Samalik wrote:
> I don't think we should use "rawhide" to mean
"rolling updates", because it
> also has the implication of "project devel stream".
Just to make sure we're on the same page: I was talking about specifying an
EOL field, not a stream name. Is that what you mean, too?
Yeah. I don't think rawhide is a good EOL field. (It's actually _better_ as
a stream name.)
> I know there was pushback against naming stream branches
"stable", so is
> there a good _other_ way to offer this? If I name the stream branch "5"
> after the upstream major release, how do I get people in the first case
> seamlessly on to "6" when it comes out, whenever that is?
"latest" would be the best option here:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/modularity/making-modules/naming-gui...
So, I guess "latest" and "stable" are probably good standard choices.
I kind
of want "latest" and "slow". :)
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader