On 01/27/2016 11:32 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> The list is correct according to PackageDB. I don't rememeber if anyone
> ever initiated the non-responsive packager process for athimm or
> chitlesh.
I don't know if somebody filed one against athimm (I had thought so),
but I am the one who filed one against chitlesh
(
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1484).