On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 03:01:55PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> But wait also: can't the module just refer to the
release-branch (base)
> dist-git? Why maintain two copies?
Well, they can. But someone needs to build it twice: once using fedpkg
build and once using fedpkg module-build from the different repo
(which always requires at least empty commit).
That's kind of annoying. Can we use Freshmaker or similar to auto-build the
module?
> [2] hey, what happened to sgallagh's "hybrid"
proposal where output from
> modules could just be *tagged into* base? That seemed perfect for cases
> like this.
Well, it is called UM which is stuck in the FESCo loop.
That seems significantly more complicated to me. Ursa Major is about adding
modules to the buildroot; the "hybrid" idea was that the modular package
builds could also be tagged as "regular" builds and land in the non-modular
repo.
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader