On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 08:54:08AM -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
There's every indication that were we to so choose, Microsoft
would happily
sign our binaries and allow us to boot on Secure Boot constrained ARM
machines at no additional cost. We believe that without the guarantee that
you can disable Secure Boot or use your own chain of trust, it isn't a
platform we can or should support.
To emphasise this point - Microsoft will sign EBC objects, so it's not
obvious that there's any way they *could* block a bootloader for ARM
devices. We're just choosing not to.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59(a)srcf.ucam.org