On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Neal Gompa <ngompa13(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Jonathan Wakely
<jwakely(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 21/07/15 15:45 +0200, Petr Hracek wrote:
>>
>> Feel free to send us any comment or improvements. We would like to
>> improve Fedora for developers.
>> Just contents are missing.
>
>
> Under "The latest stable runtimes and frameworks Packaged in Fedora
> and ready to use!" would it be worth mentioning C and C++?
>
> GCC 5 is the first compiler to default to the latest C11 standard, and we
> ship more of the latest C++ standard library extensions than any
> other compiler.
>
> There's a lot happening in that space, and not everyone gets excited
> by shiny dynamic languages ;-)
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Personally, I'm a little uncomfortable with the phrasing "Fedora is made for
developers". It implies that we don't do anything to make it great for
non-developers, which is not true at all. Is there a better way we can word
this?
The site is specifically targeted at developers. The URL will likely
be something like
developers.fedoraproject.org. This isn't a generic,
front-page site. Given the targeted nature of it, I think it's
perfectly fine to say Fedora is built for developers. I mean, you
wouldn't want a developer coming to this page and seeing "Fedora is
built for everyone" and then a bunch of text explaining that.
josh