On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 06:52, Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta(a)iki.fi> wrote:
On Sat, 2004-09-11 at 22:03, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> is having the modules executable an actual problem?
AFAICT it's the same problem or non-problem as with any file out there
if a file that is not meant to be executable has executable bits set.
But I believe it's pretty much cosmetic in this case.
http://www.yak.net/carmen/unix_horror.html
Go to the above URL and search for the submission from mike(a)sojurn.lns.pa.us .
--
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page