On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 09:55:22 +0100
Dan Horák <dan(a)danny.cz> wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 09:42:55 +0100
"J. Scheurich" <mufti11(a)web.de> wrote:
>
> > I have looked at your spec/srpm and it needs much improvement,
>
> What can be improvided ?
> The srpm produces a valid rpm on all architecures,
> all tips of
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653481
>
> has been followed.
well, I can't even see the spec file, the Spec URL: points to a web
site, not to the spec file :-( There is a reason why the review
template has this entry.
ah, there is a second review where it has been fixed
Dan