-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Valent Turkovic wrote:
2008/2/20 Benjamin Kreuter <ben.kreuter(a)gmail.com>:
> On Wednesday 20 February 2008 05:45:47 Valent Turkovic wrote:
> >
> > If this arguments are true for Fedora 8 than it looks like that more
> > people dislike selinux than like it, right?
>
> It is also possible that they had not enabled SELinux in the past, and never
> had time to enable it in more recent Fedora releases. Enabling SELinux for
> the first time requires the entire filesystem to be scanned, and for some
> people who have large disks and have been using their system for a while,
> that could be a hassle, so they may choose to not do it.
>
> Also remember that these stats do not represent an unbiased sample, and should
> not be taken to be an indication of the broad Fedora user base.
>
Are you telling this stats are useless? Or only that everybody can
interpret them as they wish? (which is the same as being useless?)
I'm really confused...
I think the stats are developing. Currently we are not providing enough
information to make a real good interpretation of the data. 50 % of all
machines that smolt has ever collected data for report they have selinux
_enabled. This does not mean the other 50% reported that they have it
disabled, just that they have not reported that it is enabled. :^( I
sound like a politician.
Lies, Damn Lies and Statistics.
And yes Valent has been working with us to repair problems in SELinux.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAke/SQcACgkQrlYvE4MpobNMEACeKDPD9WlxSNtvG/S0MJB63BLF
o+UAn2MH805WieRoUeZ9xOr9Wo8jKIES
=KKVU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----