On 09/01/2009 11:53 AM, Iain Arnell wrote:
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Tom "spot"
Callaway<tcallawa(a)redhat.com> wrote:
[snip]
>
> Yes... this is all correct. Any package that is using commas in the
> license field should have a bug opened against it.
Unless it's "Redistributable, no modification permitted", presumably?
Yeah. That's a special case.
~spot