seth vidal wrote:
>Have you considerer smart :
>http://www.smartpm.org/
>
>It is Interesting. But sometimes it ignore %{epoch} (for good or bad
>reason it's not the point), does not support group, the gui interface is
>a little confusing.
>Smart is quite fast (python), have gnome, kde, text interface. It's in
>beta/testing stage.
>
>
At this point smart doesn't have multilib support (at least from reading
of the code) so I'm not sure how useful that will be for a distro
offering (soon, I hope) two multilib archs: x86_64 and ppc64.
Multilib pkg choice is a work of hours, not more.
Smartpm needs RHN channel too.
73 de Jeff