On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 06:31:18AM +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hi folks,
Thanks all for the input. I didn't realize the subject was *this*
controversial. I did find the other discussion thread[1] which was aimed
at completing the draft I had linked to, and as you'll notice it was
inconclusive. I was hoping something had changed (the thread dates back
to 2008).
I do believe in patching configure.in, and Makefile.am and the rest, but
this package seems a little out of my scope which is why I was thinking
of running autoreconf in the spec.
Running autoreconf in the spec is fine.
Running autoreconf manually and producing a patch based on that output is
also fine.
The question hasn't come before the fpc in a while (and we have different
members now) but the draft you linked to did not have the votes to pass the
last time it came up.
-Toshio