On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 04:40:46PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
That was my suggestion. All I got was negative comments (AIUI, nobody
else
wanted anything less than a majority of FESCo to be able to approve direct
stable pushes, at least nobody said otherwise in the meeting), and even
outright accusations of proposing ad personam rules:
[begin quote (from the meeting log)]
Feb 23 21:58:17 <notting> Kevin_Kofler: of course you'd say 1 FESCo
member, becuase from your statements, it sounds like you would intentionally
sabotage the process and approve everything
[end quote]
Notting's statement was in response to your earlier:
23-02-2010 20:48:05 <Kevin_Kofler>: OK by 1 rel-eng member would be fine
with me (I could just bug rdieter ;-)
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59(a)srcf.ucam.org