On Mon, 4 Jan 2016, Josh Boyer wrote:
> * Update existing python-suds package to suds-jurko and ensure
it
> builds/works in Rawhide. (NOTE: proposal owner is not currently the
> maintainer of python-suds, but would intend to assume maintainership
> as part of this change.) The plan is to use the latest hg snapshot of
> suds-jurko.
Has the current python-suds maintainer been contacted about this
change directly? If so, did they have an opinion on it?
I haven't yet, but I will attempt to do so now.
> Other developers:
> * For maintainers of packages that depend on python-suds: test the
> dependent packages to ensure they work correctly with the updated
> python-suds package. No changes should be needed as the Jurko fork is
> believed to maintain compatibility with the original Suds.
Can someone actually check this for compatibility instead of just believing?
As a data point, I have tested it with the package that I maintain
(congruity) and it works fine as a drop-in replacement.
Scott