Leonard den Ottolander (leonard(a)den.ottolander.nl) said:
> > With an fsck result code of 3 however the system passes the
next fsck
> > with no errors whatsoever. Could it be that fsck's result code on
> > failure actually is -1? Or any other value? Or does initlog (via which
> > fsck is called) somehow change the result value?
>
> It shouldn't change it, no.
So any idea why the fsck fails although no errors are left on the file
system?
Not off the top of my head without looking at the source code.
Bill