On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 08:39 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
End of August I've opened tickets about duplicate and
potentially
conflicting (because if noarch <-> arch differences) %doc files.
The response from packagers has not been brilliant so far.
These are _package bugs_ specific to Fedora, so it's the responsibility
of a Fedora Packager to fix them. It's a mistake in the spec file, not
in the packaged software.
"Potentially conflicting" may mean that several subpackages could not
be installed at once and would cause a transaction error.
Rather than spamming bugzilla with lots of NEEDINFO calls, hereby I'd
like to raise awareness of the issue. I don't understand why packagers
don't respond in bugzilla. Fedora 20 is near.
If you mentioned a list of bugs or at least a shared string from the
descriptions of all of them, maybe provenpackagers could take some time
to help out. (Well, I guess we could go digging in your bugzilla
history, but it seems like more trouble than is necessary.)
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net