Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 06/28/2009 10:32 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> Rahul, I question the point of ... making laundry lists of pros, cons,
> bugs
> of desktop X vs Y... I'm sure folks can come up with a similar list of
> gnome (or other) related negative items, or kde-only features too but I
> question it's constructiveness.
The constructiveness if for KDE SIG and individuals to accept...
I am not going there... la la la.
> 2. A bigger question to me is what does it mean to be the
"default"
> desktop. All this "it's the default because..." comments make me
wonder
> if
> folks are just grasping for reasons to justify the status quo. Where or
> how
> is this documented anywhere? If it isn't, shouldn't it be?
Why single out desktop environments? Is the justifications for all of
our defaults documented anywhere? Shouldn't it be?
Indeed, amen brother, but you've gotta start somewhere.
-- Rex