Rui Miguel Seabra wrote:
On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 10:39 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
>
>>However, the permission granted by UW to you does not suffice to satisfy
>>the (what I believe to be the) general definition of open source
>>software, which means the right to redistribute with any modification.
>
>That's your opinion. My opinion is that opensource implies only that
>you have access to the source and rights to with it (mostly) as you
>like, which doesn't necessarily imply any sort of binary redistribution
>right.
Your opinion is irrelevant.
And so is yours. Only Fedora's counts here. That's been my point all
along. *Any* other arguement is also irrelavent.
Actually, the kind of opinions like yours are one of the reasons I
prefer
to speak about Free Software (Software Livre in Portuguese):
See above.
-- Rex